Green Bay Packers running back Josh Jacobs found himself at the center of a social media storm this week after making controversial remarks about Brazil on “The Green Light Podcast” with Chris Long. Jacobs had suggested that wearing green in certain parts of Brazil, specifically São Paulo, could be dangerous due to gang activity.

His comments came as the Packers prepared for their NFL International Series opener against the Philadelphia Eagles in São Paulo. Following backlash and clarification that his information was incorrect, Jacobs issued an apology to Brazil via his Instagram story, stating, “damn I was misinformed sorry brazil, see you soon.”

The controversy began when Jacobs appeared on Chris Long's podcast and discussed the Packers' upcoming trip to Brazil. His comments suggested that the color green, the primary color for both the Packers and Eagles, could pose a safety risk due to gang associations.

“They said the part of Brazil we going to you can't even wear green at,” Jacobs remarked. “They said, I guess something to do with the gangs.”

These remarks quickly drew attention and sparked debate among NFL fans and the broader public. Given that both the Packers and the Eagles predominantly wear green, Jacobs' comments raised questions about the NFL's decision-making process regarding the game's location.

The initial fallout from Jacobs' comments was swift. Many fans and commentators criticized the NFL for potentially overlooking such a significant detail in their planning. However, it soon became apparent that Jacobs' information was inaccurate.

Brazilian soccer teams such as Palmeiras and Corinthians, which are based in São Paulo, also wear green, debunking the claim that the color posed a significant threat due to gang affiliations.

Upon realizing his mistake, Jacobs took to Instagram to issue a public apology. His post read, “damn I was misinformed sorry brazil, see you soon.” The apology aimed to clarify his earlier statements and smooth over any offense caused by his remarks.

The public reaction to Jacobs' apology was mixed, with many understanding his position while others remained critical. Here are some notable reactions from Twitter:

@97Jaeger11: “Why should he apologize if he repeated what he was told by the team?”

Robbie Curtis (@RobbieCurtis228): “@john_fluhr oh look… Jacobs confirmed he spread misinformation 🤷🏻‍♀️”

Kyle Roloff (@Mr_kRolo): “Makes me like Jacobs even more haha. Heard the same stuff my reaction would be the same.”

Jay Boller (@jaymboller): “he wasn't really familiar with its game”

Jimmy Haffa (@HaffaJimmy6385): “Honest mistake”

SeedPlant (@ChiaWatchItGrow): “Since purple, dark blue, and orange aren't allowed inside Lambeau, I can see why Packers fans believed this.”

These reactions showcase a range of perspectives, from understanding and supportive to critical and dismissive, reflecting the complex nature of public opinion on such matters.

The NFL's International Expansion

A general overall view of the playing of the national anthem with German and United States flags on the field during an NFL International Series game between the Indianapolis Colts and the New England Patriots at Deutsche Bank Park.
© Kirby Lee-USA TODAY Sports

The NFL's decision to expand its International Series to South America marks a significant milestone. Since 2007, the league has played games in England, Mexico, and Germany, with plans to include Spain by 2025. The Packers-Eagles game in São Paulo is particularly notable as it represents the NFL's first foray into South America, a region where soccer (or “futbol”) reigns supreme.

Despite Jacobs' initial comments, the NFL has assured that comprehensive safety measures are in place for the game in São Paulo. The league's long history of successfully hosting international games in various countries suggests a high level of preparedness and consideration for local conditions.

Moreover, the Eagles, designated as the home team for this matchup, will have the advantage of selecting their jersey color. This decision could mitigate any remaining concerns related to team colors and local sensitivities, although the clarification regarding the inaccuracy of Jacobs' statements should alleviate these worries.

Jacobs' incident underscores the importance of accurate information, especially when discussing international events and cultural contexts. In this case, the misinformation had the potential to cast a negative light on the host country and its communities. By promptly apologizing, Jacobs helped to rectify the situation, though it serves as a reminder of the need for careful communication.

As the Packers and Eagles prepare for their historic game in São Paulo, the focus will hopefully shift back to the sport and the unique opportunity this game presents. The NFL's efforts to grow its global footprint are commendable, and this game will be a test of the league's ability to engage new audiences and navigate the complexities of international sports diplomacy.

In conclusion, while Josh Jacobs' remarks about gang activity and the color green in Brazil sparked controversy, his subsequent apology has helped to address the misinformation. The upcoming Packers-Eagles game in São Paulo remains a landmark event in the NFL's international expansion, and fans around the world will be watching closely to see how it unfolds.