Fans of former South Africa captain AB de Villiers tore into India dasher Suryakumar Yadav following his third golden duck on the trot against Australia this week.

Known for his unorthodox style, AB de Villiers is widely viewed as the first Mr. 360 of cricket. Following the retirement of AB de Villiers, Suryakumar Yadav received the same title for his similar striking style.

However, AB de Villiers' supporters have never given Suryakumar Yadav the same respect as they believe that the Indian batter only scores runs against teams like Australia, England, or South Africa.

They even call him a “minnow basher” who only performs against lower-ranked teams like Zimbabwe, Afghanistan, Bangladesh, etc.



Once again, Suryakumar Yadav was mercilessly trolled on Twitter after he scripted an unwanted world record, becoming the first international cricketer to score three consecutive golden ducks in ODIs.

The 32-year-old player's bizarre feat came against Australia following his dismissal for naught in the final match in Chennai. Before his dismissal to Ashton Agar on the first delivery he faced at the MA Chidambaram Stadium, Suryakumar Yadav suffered a similar fate in Mumbai and Visakhapatnam, losing his wicket on ball No.1 at the two venues.

With Suryakumar Yadav setting an unwanted record, Team India supporters took to Twitter to mock him for his batting display against the Australians.

In the post-match analysis on Star Sports, his fellow commentators asked the legendary Sunil Gavaskar about what was wrong with Suryakumar Yadav. The 1983 World Cup winner pointed out that the No.1 T20I batter was perhaps a bit anxious besides getting two good balls from Mitchell Starc in Mumbai and Visakhapatnam.

Live and breathe sports?

🚨 Get viral graphics, memes, rumors and trending sports news delivered right to your inbox with the Clutch Newsletter.

“Nothing, nothing,” Sunil Gavaskar said.

“He has just got to understand that this can happen to the best of players and it has happened to the best of players. So I think, all he has got to do now is forget these 3 matches and focus on the IPL, get runs over there. Once he gets runs in the IPL, he will come back confident for the next one-day game,” he added.

“Well, he was out first-ball 3 times. It's very difficult to say what is going wrong. Yes, there were two good deliveries that Mitchell Starc bowled in the first 2 matches. Yes, he might have been a little too anxious,” the ex-India skipper argued.

Suryakumar Yadav has contrasting stats in T20Is and ODIs. In T20Is, Suryakumar Yadav has become the backbone of India's batting, and the 32-year-old dasher became the first Indian batter to score over a thousand runs in a calendar year in T20Is, in 2022. On the other hand, he's yet to cement his place in the 50-over format, forget winning matches.

Unlike the T20Is, where he is the No.1 batter in the world, Suryakumar Yadav has failed to make much of an impact, having collected 433 runs at an under-par average of 25.05, with two fifties in 23 ODIs. His highest score of 64 in ODIs came a year ago, in February 2022.

Like Sunil Gavaskar, India captain Rohit Sharma defended Suryakumar Yadav, saying three balls cannot be used as a barometer to judge a player's caliber, skill set, and talent.

“He only played three balls in three (games) this series. I don't know how much to look into it. He got three good balls, to be honest. Today, it wasn't that good ball; he should have gone forward. He knows best. He plays spin so well. We have seen that over last couple of years. That's why we held him back and give him that role for the last 15-20 overs where he can play his game, but it's really unfortunate he could only play three balls. That can happen to anyone. But the potential and ability is always there. He is just going through that phase right now,” Rohit Sharma said after the match.

Even the great Kapil Dev praised the Indian team management for backing Suryakumar Yadav before adding that the explosive batter deserved a long rope in ODIs given that he could emerge as the X-factor in a World Cup year.

“A cricketer who has played so well will always get more chances. Don't compare Surya with Sanju Samson, it doesn't seem right. If Sanju goes through a bad phase then you will talk about somebody else. This should not happen. If the team management has decided to back Suryakumar Yadav then he should be given more chances. Yes, people will talk, give their opinion but ultimately it's the management's call,” Kapil Dev told ABP News.

“It's very easy to talk after the match is finished. Maybe the idea behind sending Suryakumar at No.7 was to give him an opportunity as a finisher. This (shuffling of the batting order) is nothing new in ODIs. This has happened many times before. Yes, at times it can happen that a batter's confidence is dented if he has been dragged down the order. But the onus rests on the player to tell his captain that ‘I can handle myself in the top order.' The coach and captain must have taken the decision with particular thinking,” he added.

Despite his horrible numbers against Australia, India head coach Rahul Dravid threw his weight behind Suryakumar Yadav, saying that the explosive batter was still learning the art of batting in ODIs.

“He has played a lot of T20 cricket in the IPL and then in India colours, but is learning the 50-over game a bit as he has not played enough of it. We need to give him some time and be patient with him,” Rahul Dravid said.

“Even though he hadn't played for India for a really long time, in T20 cricket he played nearly 10 years of the IPL, which as a tournament is almost like international cricket. But he has hardly had similar 50-over game time. All that he has got over the years is Vijay Hazare Trophy,” Rahul Dravid explained.

But former India opener Wasim Jaffer suggested that the Indian think tank should look for other options like Sanju Samson rather than sticking with Suryakumar Yadav.

“I will probably sympathize with him. It doesn't happen even to a No. 11 batter. It's one of those things – getting out for a golden duck three times in a row. It will never happen to him again hopefully. It's just bad luck. But I think India need to look somewhere else. Even though he is a quality player and he will come up pretty good. Once the IPL starts, he will be in his elements at the format he is best at,” Wasim Jaffer said on ESPNCricinfo.

“I think India need to probably look at Sanju Samson but still stick with Surya because he is a quality player. If he comes good, we all know he is a match-winner. You don't need to keep him aside. If the IPL goes well for him, you will be tempted to play him again but India really need to look at Sanju Samson,” he concluded.