The 2022 NBA trade deadline was incredibly exciting. It was dominated by the James Harden-Ben Simmons trade, but deals were flying in for the entire day and for the few days before Thursday. Many teams changed their rosters in a major way and solidified their direction, whether it means strengthening their roster for the upcoming playoffs or going into a full rebuild.
Along with everything in sports, the trade deadline brought in some winners and some losers. Without further ado, here are the biggest losers of the 2022 NBA trade deadline.
*Watch NBA games LIVE with fuboTV (click for free trial)*
2022 NBA trade deadline losers
The Blazers, along with the San Antonio Spurs and Boston Celtics, were the busiest teams ahead of the deadline. Portland finally decided to dissolve its team and go for a rebuild around Damian Lillard. This is actually their second attempt at rebuilding around Dame Dolla, with the first one coming in the summer of 2015 when LaMarcus Aldridge left Oregon for the San Antonio Spurs. That rebuild gave the Blazers a few playoff runs, with the most famous one being the 2019 trip to the Western Conference Finals.
However, this rebuild might be worse off, especially since the Blazers lost a ton and gained little for what they gave up. Firstly, a few days before the trade deadline, they gave up Norman Powell and Robert Covington in a deal that landed them Justise Winslow, Keon Johnson, Eric Bledsoe, and a second-round pick. Powell was just signed to a huge deal in August of last year and was contributing in a major way for the Blazers, yet they landed players that, most likely, will not be major factors on any future Blazers team. Keon Johnson does have potential, but with the squad being guard-heavy already, he might be trounced by the competition.
Then, the Blazers outdid themselves by trading longtime starting guard CJ McCollum to the Pelicans in a package centered around a protected first-round pick and Josh Hart. It is true that Hart is a great fit next to Lillard, especially being a defense-first guard with a huge frame for his position, but McCollum must be worth more than that. The Blazers were hot on the trade trigger, and that led them to two poor decisions that were meant to jumpstart their rebuild, but rather put them in a worse place going forward.
They got a ton of potential cap space, but even having Damian Lillard on the roster hasn't brought much free agent success to Portland in the past. Also, this is also about one move they did not do: trading Jusuf Nurkic. The center is on an expiring deal and is playing his best basketball since the 2020 NBA bubble, so he will seek upwards of $20 million annually in the upcoming summer. If they give him the money, that will leave them with limited cap space, and if they do not, they will lose a good piece for nothing.
Article Continues BelowThe Blazers have a direction, but their moves could have been so much better.
Mavericks and Wizards
In the end, the choice was too tough to make, so it is simpler to state that both the Washington Wizards and Dallas Mavericks are huge losers after this trade deadline. The two franchises completed a deal that sent Kristaps Porzingis and a second-round pick to the Wizards in exchange for Spencer Dinwiddie and Davis Bertans.
Looking at it as it stands, the Wizards got the best player involved in the deal, so they could be considered the nominal winners, but with the state of Porzingis and his play, they seem like less of a loser, more than an outright winner. This is the squad that just traded away Montrezl Harrell to the Charlotte Hornets and shut down their biggest star, Bradley Beal, for the season. Getting Porzingis in, regardless of his status as a former All-Star, does not seem logical. One saving grace might be that the Wizards are going to use him together with Beal and the rest of their roster next season to attack the East, but even with the Unicorn, their roster does not square up to the top of the conference.
For the Mavericks, the trade of Porzingis was inevitable, but this deal just does not make any sense. Dinwiddie is a solid player, but he is incredibly inconsistent and needs the ball in his hands to operate. That could go against the Mavs' game plan, which is to give the ball to Luka Doncic and only hope for a playoff future in the West. Getting Bertans, in a vacuum, is a good deal since the Mavs need shooting, but his play this season suggests that he is a complete non-factor, scoring just around six points per contest on 31.9% shooting from 3-point land.
The move could make sense in the future, depending on the availability of both Dinwiddie and Porzingis, the fit of Porzingis next to Beal and Dinwiddie next to Doncic, and on Bertans regaining his shooting touch. Unfortunately, there are way too many variables and the deal just needs so many things going its way that it is hard to even imagine it pans out all that well for either side.