There was a rather contentious moment in Game 2 of the NBA Finals as Draymond Green was called for a foul on Jaylen Brown attempting a 3-point shot.
With the Golden State Warriors forward already harboring a technical foul, he got into it with Brown while both of them were sprawled on the floor. In the end, neither one were given technical fouls:
No techs were called on either Brown or Greenpic.twitter.com/ZvD1DuiVjh
— ClutchPoints (@ClutchPoints) June 6, 2022
Draymond Green is no stranger to some extracurricular incidents during the NBA Finals. He famously drew a suspension in 2016, which is considered a huge reason why LeBron James and the Cleveland Cavaliers were able to come back from a 3-1 deficit. That's why the call carried so much weight in that without Green, Golden State could have a harder time preventing a 0-2 hole before going to Boston.
But the controversy stemmed from the ESPN broadcast booth as Jeff Van Gundy and Mark Jackson both questioned NBA referee consultant Steve Javie about how a ref would deliberate such a play. He responded by explaining how they use “selective enforcement” at times for such situations:
“The two guys were going after each other. … You have to consider one player has definitely a technical foul. Is this enough to call a double T and eject the one player? Personally, I would say nothing and just let it defuse as that,” said Javie during the NBA Finals broadcast.
Jackson followed up by asking whether NBA referees actively consider the fact that a player, in this case Draymond Green, already has a technical foul:
“Absolutely,” answered Javie. “I think that's part of good officiating is the fact that you have to know who has the technical fouls — and in this situation, one of the players does. Is this enough to warrant an ejection is what you have to think about.”




The response was a surprising one, to say the least. With an NBA Finals on the line, fans were left perplexed over the admission and the situational treatment referees supposedly use when deliberating such a review:
Adam Silver said earlier today the Warriors being back in the Finals is a good thing.
We had Steve Javie, the NBA's officiating analyst, explain refs use "selective enforcement" for certain players/fouls.
The NBA knows exactly what it's doing and isn't even trying to hide it.
— Jackson Gatlin (@JTGatlin) June 6, 2022
Steve Javie is on live TV admitting that referees ignore the rule book to factor in ejecting Draymond. That’s so damn ridiculous.
— Roosh (@RooshWilliams) June 6, 2022
Steve Javie literally just said that’s what refs do too. That’s terrible just in general
— Patrick Green (@patrick2green) June 6, 2022
Draymond has proven that he has an issue with keeping his composure when he already has a tech but yet Steve Javie thinks the refs should baby him @NBA
— Rob Jots (@RobJots) June 6, 2022
No, but I disagree with Steve Javie saying the refs should consider Draymond already having a T. If what you do deserves a T, it shouldn’t matter if you already have one.
— Clay Adams (@_clayonce) June 6, 2022
Safe to say this won't be the last time that discussion and subsequent admission by Steve Javie will be brought up, both in the Twitterverse as well as in potential NBA games to come.