Subscribe
Follow Us
Super Bowl champions lay claim to being the best team in the NFL. However, not all Super Bowl winners are made equal. Some teams won the championship in dominant fashion and during seasons where it seemed clear all year long that they'd end up hoisting the Lombardi Trophy. Other teams either made Cinderella runs or had an easy path to winning a ring. In this article, we decided to ask ChatGPT who the worst Super Bowl winners ever are. So, check out the gallery to see what artificial intelligence has to say. We've provided our own analysis to either back up or disagree with ChatGPT's claims.
1. Super Bowl XXXIX (2005): New England Patriots
ChatGPT reasoning:
- Record: 14-2 regular season, Super Bowl champions
- Why they were “bad”: This Patriots team wasn’t bad per se, but they were the epitome of a team that “won ugly.” The offense was far less explosive than the other Tom Brady-led Patriots teams. The team was more about grinding out wins with a solid defense, conservative play calling, and an almost no-frills approach to offense. They didn’t dominate, but they won with consistency, smart football, and just enough clutch play to seal the deal.
- Super Bowl XL Performance: The Patriots won a close, low-scoring game against the Philadelphia Eagles, 24-21. The game was very tight, with neither team pulling away, and the Eagles actually had more offensive yards.
ClutchPoints analysis: A 14-2 Super Bowl champion sounds pretty good to us, so we have to disagree wholeheartedly with ChatGPT ranking the Super Bowl XXXIX winners as one of the worst championship-winning teams ever. While the New England Patriots weren't as dominant in 2004-05 as they were in other seasons during their nearly two-decade-long reign on top of the league, they still knew what it took to win ball games, and sometimes that is all it takes.
The team still blew teams out with regularity, too. They scored 30 or more points six times, including in the playoffs. They even ranked in the top five in both points for and points against. Considering this was Tom Brady's third championship, he was pretty well established as a megastar and quarterback legend. The defense was particularly impressive, though. Asante Samuel, Rodney Harrison, Willie McGinest, Mike Vrabel, and Tedy Bruschi only allowed 16.3 points per game.
When it comes to the Super Bowl itself, Deion Branch had one of the best non-quarterback championship games ever. He caught 11 balls for 133 yards en route to winning the MVP.
2. Super Bowl XLIV (2010): New Orleans Saints
ChatGPT reasoning:
- Record: 13-3 regular season, Super Bowl champions
- Why they were “bad”: The Saints had a good season but didn’t exactly blow people away. Their defense was average at best, and their offense had a tendency to rely on Drew Brees pulling off the incredible. While they finished strong, their regular season had its fair share of close games and they didn’t look like the dominant force they seemed to be during the postseason.
- Super Bowl XLIV Performance: The Saints' 31-17 win over the Indianapolis Colts was solid, but the game wasn’t as impressive as some other Super Bowl performances. The most memorable play was a successful onside kick in the third quarter, which was a gutsy move but also a bit of a “desperate” feeling play. The Saints were opportunistic rather than dominant in the Super Bowl.
ClutchPoints analysis: Drew Brees is one of the best quarterbacks of all time, and he regularly put up massive numbers. He – along with head coach Sean Payton on the New Orleans Saints – only won one championship, though. That was their Super Bowl XLIV victory over the Indianapolis Colts.
With 31.9 points per game, the Saints were dominant on offense. Brees fed the ball to stars such as Marques Colston, Jeremy Shockey, Pierre Thomas, and Reggie Bush. However, their defense was average at best. While the offense did enough to carry the team to championship glory, they certainly weren't as well-rounded as many of the other Super Bowl winners throughout history.
During the Super Bowl, the Saints trailed at halftime. Right as play started, though, the team successfully recovered an onside kick that turned the game around. The play is one of the best Super Bowl moments ever, but it took them stealing a possession from Indianapolis for them to have a shot at the Lombardi Trophy. Additionally, this team has gone down as a controversial winner in hindsight. The Saints operated their “bountygate” during this time, and they allegedly would reward players for intentionally hurting opponents.
3. Super Bowl XLII (2008): New York Giants
ChatGPT reasoning:
- Record: 10-6 regular season, Super Bowl champions
- Why they were “bad”: The Giants were the ultimate underdog story. They had a solid defense but were far from the most powerful offensive team. Eli Manning was known for inconsistency, and the team’s overall regular season record didn’t scream Super Bowl champion. They got hot at the right time but they weren’t one of the better teams in the league that season.
- Super Bowl XLII Performance: The Giants famously beat the undefeated New England Patriots 17-14. It was more of a defensive, scrappy win than a show of overwhelming talent. The Patriots were heavily favored and dominated for most of the game, but the Giants capitalized on a few key moments, like the iconic “helmet catch” by David Tyree.
ClutchPoints analysis: Only seven wildcard teams have ever won the Super Bowl. The New York Giants team that brought home the Lombardi Trophy during Super Bowl XLII was one of them. This 2007-08 squad will be remembered forever. They prevented the Patriots from completing an undefeated season, and David Tyree's helmet catch is arguably the most iconic Super Bowl moment ever.
However, aside from that, the Giants were a pretty mediocre-at-best championship winner. They succeeded at the right time, but on the year as a whole, they weren't all that special. Eli Manning's 20 interceptions, for example, led the entire NFL.
4. Super Bowl XXXVI (2002): New England Patriots
ChatGPT reasoning:
- Record: 11-5 regular season, Super Bowl champions
- Why they were “bad”: The 2001 Patriots were a team with no big names and no expectations. They entered the Super Bowl as massive underdogs and didn't look like one of the better teams in the league. The team’s offense was largely driven by a young Tom Brady, who was still trying to find his way as a starter. The defense was solid but not elite.
- Super Bowl XXXVI Performance: They managed to beat the heavily favored St. Louis Rams (the “Greatest Show on Turf”) 20-17 in one of the biggest upsets in Super Bowl history. While Brady was clutch, the win wasn’t because of a dominant performance across the board; they simply played a perfect game at the right time.
ClutchPoints analysis: Having one Tom Brady-led Patriots team on this list was bad enough for ChatGPT, but the fact that they included two teams from the greatest dynasty ever on this list is just ludicrous. Granted, this was the Patriots' first Super Bowl win, so nobody knew that Brady was Brady yet. In fact, Brady wasn't even the Week 1 starter, and it took a Drew Bledsoe injury for him to be thrust into action.
Still, fans quickly realized there was something special there with the eventual greatest NFL player of all time. The St. Louis Rams were heavily favored against the Patriots due to their “Greatest Show on Turf” offense, but the Patriots were able to limit their effectiveness, and Brady managed the game to perfection on offense. Like Brady, Adam Vinatieri also established himself as a legend during Super Bowl XXXVI when he kicked the game-winning field goal.
Of all of the Brady-led championship teams, this is probably the worst one. While a number of players on the squad would eventually go down as legends, most of them were still unheralded at this time. The team was actually outgained 427-267 in yardage during the championship game.
5. Super Bowl XXV (1991): New York Giants
ChatGPT reasoning:
- Record: 13-3 regular season, Super Bowl champions
- Why they were “bad”: The Giants had a good but not spectacular season. Their offense was rather conservative, relying on the power running game and field-position play. While their defense was solid, they weren’t particularly dominant in terms of personnel or innovation. They were a team that won through grit and control, rather than sheer talent.
- Super Bowl XXV Performance: The Giants beat the Buffalo Bills 20-19 in one of the most thrilling, hard-fought Super Bowls. However, the game was more about Buffalo losing it (wide-right miss by Scott Norwood) than the Giants winning it with an amazing performance. The game was very tight and low-scoring, and the Giants didn’t exactly light up the scoreboard.
ClutchPoints analysis: For whatever reason, ChatGPT didn't include a lot of old-school teams on this list of the worst Super Bowl winners ever. In fact, the 1990-91 New York Giants are the only team here that played in the 20th century. There certainly is a case for the Giants being here. Their quarterback for most of the season was Phil Simms, and he was well past his prime by 1990.
Simms only had 2,284 passing yards all season long, and he actually got hurt late in the year. That led to Jeff Hostetler taking over behind center. Hostetler received some chances to start later on because of his Super Bowl victory, but for the most part, he was a career backup.
Additionally, Lawrence Taylor was also past his prime. The legendary sack artist and arguably the best defensive player ever earned his last Pro Bowl nod during a season where he had his fewest sacks (10.5) since his third season in the league. Even so, the Giants didn't need Taylor to be his normal dominant self, as the team only allowed 211 points all season. They played a smart brand of football, too, as they only committed 14 turnovers during the regular season. That was a league record at the time.
One reason artificial intelligence might have prejudice against this Giants team was because they beat the Buffalo Bills in the Super Bowl. The Bills were a team that simply couldn't win the big game, as they lost the Super Bowl in four straight seasons. Of all of those losses, this was the closest one, as Super Bowl XXV came down to a would-be game-winning field goal that Scott Norwood missed wide-right. The Giants didn't play a flashy style on the football field, and they were led by a backup quarterback. Those factors make us agree that the Super Bowl XXV-winning Giants are one of the worst championship teams ever.
6. Super Bowl XLVII (2013): Baltimore Ravens
ChatGPT reasoning:
- Record: 10-6 regular season, Super Bowl champions
- Why they were “bad”: The Ravens had a so-so regular season, and while they had a great defense and a future Hall of Fame QB in Joe Flacco, their season was full of inconsistencies. Their offense was inconsistent, and their defense wasn’t as dominant as it had been in previous years. The team barely squeaked into the playoffs and got hot at the right time.
- Super Bowl XLVII Performance: The Ravens defeated the San Francisco 49ers 34-31. The game is most famous for a 34-minute power outage in the stadium, which delayed the game and gave the 49ers a chance to make a comeback. Despite holding on for the win, the Ravens weren't exactly dominant throughout the game.
ClutchPoints analysis:
In Super Bowl XLVII, a 34-minute delay nearly allowed the San Francisco 49ers to mount a comeback. The Baltimore Ravens still came out on top, though, and before they went cold because of the delay, they were dominating their opponent. It is possible that without the delay the Ravens wouldn't be remembered by artificial intelligence as a bad Super Bowl winner.
ChatGPT's issue with this Ravens seems to stem from the fact that Ray Lewis, Ed Reed, and other members of the defense weren't as electric as they were earlier in their careers, namely when they won Super Bowl XXXV. The defense was still super fun, though, and there were some solid weapons on offense (Ray Rice, Anquan Boldin, Dennis Pitta).
Also, it might be a stretch to call Joe Flacco a Hall of Famer, as ChatGPT did in its analysis.
7. Super Bowl XXXVII (2003): Tampa Bay Buccaneers
ChatGPT reasoning:
- Record: 12-4 regular season, Super Bowl champions
- Why they were “bad”: The Buccaneers were known for their amazing defense, but their offense was rather pedestrian. The team had a lot of holes and wasn’t considered a powerhouse. Their defense carried them, but their offense often struggled to put up points. QB Brad Johnson wasn't exactly lighting up the league with his play, and the team's success was more about defense than balanced team play.
- Super Bowl XXXVII Performance: The Buccaneers dominated the Oakland Raiders 48-21 in what was a lopsided Super Bowl. The Raiders had a lot of turnovers, and the Bucs' defense was suffocating. But despite the blowout, the Bucs' offense wasn’t impressive, and the Super Bowl win often feels more like a defensive slugfest than a well-rounded victory.
ClutchPoints analysis: Defense was the 2002-03 Tampa Bay Buccaneers' calling card. In fact, they had one of the best defensive units ever, as they only allowed 12.3 points per game. Warren Sapp, Simeon Rice, Ronde Barber, and Derrick Brooks led the team on the less glamorous side of the ball.
ChatGPT was right in saying that the offense was far from spectacular, though. A lot of fans might not even remember quarterback Brad Johnson at all. The quarterback really only had two good years; this just happened to be one of them.
8. Super Bowl XLVI (2012): New York Giants
ChatGPT reasoning:
- Record: 9-7 regular season, Super Bowl champions
- Why they were “bad”: The Giants’ 9-7 regular season record isn’t exactly something you'd associate with a championship team. They weren’t spectacular in any one area and had a rollercoaster year. Their defense wasn’t as dominant as it had been in the past, and their offense was largely inconsistent. Eli Manning was inconsistent, though he had moments of brilliance.
- Super Bowl XLVI Performance: The Giants defeated the New England Patriots 21-17, in a game where they made a couple of clutch plays, but overall it wasn't a game where they looked dominant. Eli Manning was good but not outstanding, and their defense was opportunistic but not overpowering.
ClutchPoints analysis: The Super Bowl XLVI winners make it three different Giants teams appearing here as the worst Super Bowl winning teams ever. This 2011-12 Giants probably deserve to be here, though. They were only 9-7 in the regular season, which meant they had the worst regular season winning percentage of by any Super Bowl champion.
There wasn't much special about this team. They only ranked ninth in scoring (24.6 points per game) and 25th in scoring defense (25 points per game). While Eli Manning threw for a lot of yards (4,933), he was turnover-prone (16 interceptions, 8 fumbles). The Patriots were again expected to crush them in the Super Bowl, like they were supposed to in 2008. Another iconic pass saved the team's fate, though. This time it was a Manning pass to Mario Manningham.
The Giants were a good but not great team, especially for a Super Bowl winner. They just so happened to have the Patriots' number. They also beat New England during their Week 9 matchup.
